Poets.net



Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Where Freedom of Speech Still Matters

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Google Chrome  (Read 679 times)

Jennifer

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 542
    • WWW
Google Chrome
« on: September 03, 2008, 12:39:37 PM »
*
I just downloaded Google Chrome, and so far I'm impressed.

It's fast and also loads plug-ins quickly; I did not need to restart my computer.

I love its utter simplicity; no busy looking buttons and tabs. The tabs are at the top of the page, not buried in some ridiculous toolbar.

Normally, I'm a Joanie-come-lately to new tech, but decided to jump in during day 2 of Beta.

Now, I have JUST downloaded Chrome, so have not yet had a chance to encounter the inevitable beta bugs.

For those of you who feel queasy about Beta downloads, I'll keep you updated on any issues I encounter.

 :D

For those of you who have decided to the Chrome plunge, feel free to discuss here what you like and don't like about it.

*

I just tried spell-check, and it popped up immediately.


*
« Last Edit: September 03, 2008, 03:00:26 PM by Jennifer »
Logged

"Jen the Hen Speaks Softly But Carries a BIG Red Pen." --Hennifer Seagull

DuglasMark

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • Fnord!tnega repeels toef in training
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2008, 01:55:07 PM »
I haven't tried Chrome yet, but already I don't like it. Now we have another browser to 'format' about. And I still haven't checked Mac's browser, ?Safari?, nor downloaded Firefox v.3 yet.  Oh dear, what is my want-to-be-consummate perfectionistic control-freaking meatself to do?


IE is firmly establishment, Firefox counter-establishment, Chrome?  We'll see. Thanks Jennifer, I suspected Chrome would get adopted early by not-normally-early adopters. You're already helping me place Chrome demographically. Otherthan trying out Chrome, you are Firefox, no?
 
:D
Logged

am fighting— ... —to retranslate
71 poems out of typewriter language into linotype-ese. This is not so
easy as one might think;consider,if you dare,that whenever a typewriter
“key” is “struck” the “carriage” moves a given amount and the “line”
advances recklessly or individualistically. E.E.C.

Jennifer

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 542
    • WWW
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2008, 03:06:33 PM »
*

Yes, Duglas,  I have used Firefox.

It's okay, but slow and busy (in terms of layout).

I have made a discovery on Google Chrome: apparently, you can't embed photographs from other people's sites, at least not easily (I'm sure there's a workaround, though).

This is both good and bad: users can't steal bandwidth from mom and pop sources, but that also means that one can't use bandwidth from big sites like Wikipedia.

I haven't tried YouTube.

*
Logged

"Jen the Hen Speaks Softly But Carries a BIG Red Pen." --Hennifer Seagull

DuglasMark

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • Fnord!tnega repeels toef in training
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2008, 05:43:19 PM »
Jennifer,

How much of an issue is bandwidth?
Logged

am fighting— ... —to retranslate
71 poems out of typewriter language into linotype-ese. This is not so
easy as one might think;consider,if you dare,that whenever a typewriter
“key” is “struck” the “carriage” moves a given amount and the “line”
advances recklessly or individualistically. E.E.C.

Jennifer

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 542
    • WWW
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #4 on: September 03, 2008, 10:22:13 PM »
*

Bandwidth is an issue for small sites but not really for large sites with nearly limitless space.

That's why I never embed from a small site.

Also, when you embed, if the original poster takes down the photo or video, you lose it too.

*
Logged

"Jen the Hen Speaks Softly But Carries a BIG Red Pen." --Hennifer Seagull

DuglasMark

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • Fnord!tnega repeels toef in training
Re: Google Chrome
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2008, 01:36:56 AM »
Yeah, I was watching one of those 'FutureWorld/Tech" shows. The futurist made it seem as though bandwidth-for-all was already here, along with everyone having their own servers. Also, that in the near future nearly 50% of bandwidth will be used by automata: machines exchanging information, on their own, with other machines.


Logged

am fighting— ... —to retranslate
71 poems out of typewriter language into linotype-ese. This is not so
easy as one might think;consider,if you dare,that whenever a typewriter
“key” is “struck” the “carriage” moves a given amount and the “line”
advances recklessly or individualistically. E.E.C.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »